The Transcontinental Art Theorists’ Film Club has debuted with a look at the seminal 1984 Prince masterpiece Purple Rain (Dir. Albert Magnoli). On my 10-point scale, I give it a 7. Do read and join the discussion. (clipped and pasted below, 10/19/04)
Thursday, March 11, 2004
Anticipatory Set:
Thoughts on Purple Rain
1. The protagonist of Prince is a rather unlikable character: he refuses to give the women in his band any credit, he tricks Appolonia into jumping naked into a cold lake (Lake of the Isles?), and later in the movie, he actually hits her. This behavior seems to be “excused” due to the fact that his home life is “tumultuous.” My question is: why doesn’t Prince leave? Yes, his father beats his mother, but he seems to not have allegiance to either of them and seems disgusted that they both stay in that situation. Ummm… Prince? Rent in Minneapolis is cheap (probably even more so in 1984); nobody is forcing you to live in your parents’ basement. You have the power to control your own destiny.
2. What’s up with all the clowns in his bedroom? And why does the camera keep panning to them?
3. Woah. This entire movie is a big shout-out to Mpls. First Ave is in almost every scene, Prince mentions Lake Minnetonka, etc. I got excited enough seeing Har Mar Superstar in Starsky and Hutch; I don’t know if I could have handled the theatrical release of Purple Rain. Was First Ave ever really this cool? At the time this movie was made, you (Erik Moe) were 9 as opposed to me being 4; perhaps you have a better grasp on this.
4. I’ve always thought that music videos derived from movies were really cheesy. Instead of attempting an autonomous plot, they just edit together scenes from the movie in a sort of montage format. As bad as this phenomenon is, I have to say that
I’ve never seen it done in MID MOVIE before. The “When Doves Cry” scene is more or less a recap montage (and is the exact same music video that was used for MTV) of what has happened so far in the movie. Yes, we may be watching a film about Prince, but that doesn’t mean that we’re stupid. Some of us have Art History degrees.
5. How does singing the song “Purple Rain” at the end of the movie make Appolonia forgive him for being such an ass? Their last interaction had been when he hit her under that bridge and she ran away, after throwing her hoop earring at him for dramatic flair (please see question 6). Why the sudden change of heart? Is she really that weak of a female character?
6. What would be the modern-day equivalent of throwing one’s hoop earring? Ten years ago, it may have been tossing a Doc Marten or a flannel shirt… What would I toss now if I wanted to create a dramatic moment?
Friday, March 12, 2004
Welcome to the official start of Erik Moe’s and my dialogue on Purple Rain. His insight is in italics.
If it weren’t for the random soft-core porn scenes I might have thought Purple Rain was an Explore Minnesota ad. Cue multi-ethnic motorcycle couple. Cut to rural road with leaves turning. Lake scene here. Now Nicolet Mall… And how great was it to see Block E in all of its gritty pre-Disneyfication glory?
Yes, I thought is was awesome to see Block E all virgin and pure. Its strange that that development has only been there for two or three years, yet I don’t remember what it looked like before that. What was even there? Why has Hard Rock Café (which, by the way, has a Prince museum inside) erased all my former memories of Minneapolis?
I think that you’re onto something: “Explore Minnesota” ads should contain soft porn. The MOA has been around for over ten years and I doubt that its much of a draw anymore. Minnesota definitely shines best in its autumnal glory (as opposed to the frozen tundra that we are in for six months); if we interspersed leafy shots of Lake Calhoun with hot people making out without shirts, perhaps we could generate some more tourist revenue. Let’s draft up a proposal and send it to the board of tourism.
1. The protagonist of Prince is a rather unlikable character: he refuses to give the women in his band any credit, he tricks
Appolonia into jumping naked into a cold lake (Lake of the Isles?), and later in the movie, he actually hits her. This behavior seems to be “excused” due to the fact that his home life is “tumultuous.” My question is: why doesn’t Prince leave? Yes, his father
beats his mother, but he seems to not have allegiance to either of them and seems disgusted that they both stay in that
situation. Ummm… Prince? Rent in Minneapolis is cheap (probably even more so in 1984); nobody is forcing you to live in your parents’ basement. You have the power to control your own destiny.
I guess we are supposed to believe that “The Kid” (this is fiction, not a biopic) is struggling to make a name for himself, he is not yet a prince here. Still, it seemed like he had a standing gig as opening act for the Time seven nights/week - so he should have been able to afford a nice place in pre-Calhoun Square Uptown. Of course, any money he did earn from that gig could not have payed for his multi-million-dollar wardrobe (these were the days before anyone with a pulse could open up fifty credit card accounts). Clearly his days of shopping for raspberry berets, the kind you find in a second-hand store, are long gone… That store in the IDS Crystal Court must have been sustained entirely by The Kid’s purchases. How else do you explain a store in
that location that displays high fashion, jewelry, and guitars in its window?
“The Kid” is definitely a jerk. We slowly learn that this might be a case of cyclical domestic violence - like father, like son. It takes the father’s suicide attempt to wake him out of his self-obsession. His outpouring of emotion in the climactic performance of “Purple Rain” was not really a convincing turn-around, though.
Perhaps the invention of credit-debt-for-all would enable a modern-day “Kid” to escape his troubled home and have a velvety bachelor-pad to perform his various sexual conquests. I agree with your assessment.
2. What’s up with all the clowns in his bedroom? And why does the camera keep panning to them?
The presence of the clowns in his bedroom seems to reinforce The Kid’s role as a misunderstood artist. The world around him is laughing at him. Of course, this might go back to his wardrobe issues. This kind of interpretation of setting better in Psycho, for example, where it makes sense that Anthony Perkins surrounds himself with images of birds. Is there a good reason for The Kid to surround himself with clowns? Does it reinforce his ego-tripping superiority complex? Clearly his foils in “The Time” are clown-like, as are the promoters at First Ave - so maybe it makes sense for him to see the world this way. In fact, really all of the characters are clownlike. Maybe the clowns are actually family portraits and pictures of friends.
Do you think that the clowns could symbolize the fact that “The Kid” is trying to be happy and egotistical on the outside, but on the inside, he is torn up, something that is poignantly reflected in paintings of crying clowns? His character in this movie can really be summed up by a velvet painting; how appropriate, given his apparel.
3. Woah. This entire movie is a big shout-out to Mpls. First Ave is in almost every scene, Prince mentions Lake Minnetonka, etc. I got excited enough seeing Har Mar Superstar in “Starsky and Hutch;” I don’t know if I could have handled the theatrical release of “Purple Rain.” Was First Ave ever really this cool? At the time this movie was made, you were 9 as opposed to me being 4; perhaps you have a better grasp on this.
Har Mar Superstar is in Starsky and Hutch? Whoa - I’ll have to see that. My first trip to First Ave wasn’t until 1993, so I can’t vouch for the scene before then. Some of the Husker Du and Replacements videos from the early ’80s have First Avenue concert footage. I don’t remember there being so many well-dressed New Wave and Funk people in those shots, but then again those bands would have a slightly different following, wouldn’t they?
I suppose they would… First Ave is amazing, but I still find it hard to buy Appolonia’s line about people moving to Mpls. from all over to experience the club. I like the concept of house bands playing every night and only playing one song at a time. I think I would have a lot more fun at shows if I only had to listen to one song at a time.
4. I’ve always thought that music videos derived from movies were really cheesy. Instead of attempting an autonomous plot, they just edit together scenes from the movie in a sort of montage format. As bad as this phenomenon is, I have to say that I’ve never seen it done in MID MOVIE before. The “When Doves Cry” scene is more or less a recap montage (and is the exact same music video that was used for MTV) of what has happened so far in the movie. Yes, we may be watching a film about Prince, but
that doesn’t mean that we’re stupid. Some of us have Art History degrees.
I actually appreciated the flash-backs, because I was… umm… “distracted” by my viewing companion during parts of the movie. Mostly it was the long musical numbers that induced these “distractions,” so when there was a sudden plot point right after a song I didn’t always catch it.
I’m sure you’re not the first person to make-out during “Purple Rain;” I guess that’s why Prince offers such frequent re-caps. I will say that when you are actually by yourself and watching the movie, plot recaps are lame. Perhaps I will commission Ethan to help me out on this one.
5. How does singing the song “Purple Rain” at the end of the movie make Appolonia forgive him for being such an ass? Their last interaction had been when he hit her under that bridge and she ran away, after throwing her hoop earring at him for dramatic flair (please see question 6). Why the sudden change of heart? Is she really that weak of a female character?
OK, but remember it was The Kid’s hoop earring — he had given it to her earlier. So it was a pretty big dis to throw it in the dirt.
Okay, so I wasn’t making-out during the movie, but I was sleepy from prior “distractions,” thus I completely missed “The Kid” giving her his earring. This all makes more sense now.
6. What would be the modern-day equivalent of throwing one’s hoop earring? Ten years ago, it may have been tossing a Doc Marten or a flannel shirt… What would I toss now if I wanted to create a dramatic moment?
Clearly it would be more difficult to throw your thong underwear or your toungue piercing at someone. And deleting someone as a friendster isn’t very cinematic. Maybe there is no modern equivelent.
OK, but what about the scene where the sketchy promoters toss the scantily-clad dancer into a back alley dumpster. I don’t think even the Farrelly Bros. could get away with that in 2004…
Yeah! And what about when his rival says “How’s the family?” after his father’s attempted suicide? I know the guy’s an ass, but come on. That seems a bit harsh., even for the gritty world of rock music.
Do you think throwing my black-rimmed glasses could have dramatic flair? I’ve attempted to make un-Friendstering dramatic, but that becomes hard when there is no notification to the un-Friendstered party that such event has taken place. If I had input into that site, I would definitely make sure that people knew when they were no longer virtual friends with people. But then again, I’m all about petty drama.
Wednesday, March 17, 2004
Regarding the Transcontinental Art Theorist’s Film Club, Erik Moe has added this to finalize our discussion on Purple Rain
For now I will add this much to the discussion. I wouldn’t underestimate First Ave’s draw. While I think it unlikely that it is even on the radar screens of hot New Orleans performers/dancers/singers, I do think it was/is probably the most important club in the central time zone - primarily because it was/is so singular and central to the cities’ scene. Most cities have much more fragmented scenes with a variety of less-impressive venues serving different sub-cultures. The fact that First Ave. for so long was THE venue is what made it so well known all over. I think the Mpls. scene has diversified and fragmented a lot over the past 10-15 years - which is almost certainly a good thing - even if a certain amount of unity has been lost.
Hey, readers: any thoughts on what the next film discussion should be? Direct all correspondance to: jainamlewis@hotmail.com
If anybody has any extra thoughts on Purple Rain, direct them here as well. Now some thoughts on Friendster: We here at “jaina!” (formerly “Jammin’ with Jaina”) are not strangers to the idea of the dramatic un-Friendstering. One of the first blog posts that took place on this site involved announcing recent un-Friendsterings and declaring those parties to be “douchebags.” This posting has become a favorite of readers, as well as a dramatic fighting-point in my personal life. Nobody wants to hear “Jaina has called you a douchebag on the internet for all to see!” After all, this could ruin any chance of ever obtaining public office or scoring with any fly honeys. Maybe the internet is too large of a forum to announce such matters, but I do think that they need to be declared. That’s why I am officially proposing the “Un-Friendster Notification.” Upon losing a Friendster, the user would receive the following e-mail:
********************
UN-FRIENDSTER NOTICE
Dear John Doe,
You have lost Friendster Jane Doe due to the following reasons:
_ Friendster has quit service.
_ Friendster has violated user agreements.
_ Other
Explanation: JOHN, YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE. WHAT’S UP WITH TELLING EVERYBODY THAT YOU STOOD ME UP WHEN WE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE A DATE? YOU ARE NO LONGER MY FRIENDSTER.
Thank you,
Friendster Services
*********************
Yes, the drama is petty and stupid, but so is Friendster. This notice would make events known without having to ruin the public reputation of the un-Friendstered party.